Correlation Between QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between QBE Insurance Group and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in QBE Insurance with a short position of AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR.
Diversification Opportunities for QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR
0.71 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between QBE and AAC is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding QBE Insurance Group and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR and QBE Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on QBE Insurance Group are associated (or correlated) with AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR has no effect on the direction of QBE Insurance i.e., QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR
Assuming the 90 days horizon QBE Insurance Group is expected to under-perform the AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, QBE Insurance Group is 2.21 times less risky than AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR. The stock trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR is currently generating about 0.42 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 350.00 in AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 110.00 from holding AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR or generate 31.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
QBE Insurance Group vs. AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR
Performance |
Timeline |
QBE Insurance Group |
AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR |
QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR
The main advantage of trading using opposite QBE Insurance and AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if QBE Insurance position performs unexpectedly, AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR will offset losses from the drop in AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR's long position.QBE Insurance vs. Insurance Australia Group | QBE Insurance vs. Superior Plus Corp | QBE Insurance vs. SIVERS SEMICONDUCTORS AB | QBE Insurance vs. CHINA HUARONG ENERHD 50 |
AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR vs. United Insurance Holdings | AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR vs. QBE Insurance Group | AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR vs. Universal Insurance Holdings | AAC TECHNOLOGHLDGADR vs. Singapore Reinsurance |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings |