Correlation Between Regions Financial and Sterling Construction

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Regions Financial and Sterling Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Regions Financial and Sterling Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Regions Financial and Sterling Construction, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Regions Financial and Sterling Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Regions Financial with a short position of Sterling Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Regions Financial and Sterling Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for Regions Financial and Sterling Construction

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Regions and Sterling is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Regions Financial and Sterling Construction in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sterling Construction and Regions Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Regions Financial are associated (or correlated) with Sterling Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sterling Construction has no effect on the direction of Regions Financial i.e., Regions Financial and Sterling Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Regions Financial and Sterling Construction

Assuming the 90 days horizon Regions Financial is expected to generate 1.54 times less return on investment than Sterling Construction. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Regions Financial is 1.72 times less risky than Sterling Construction. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sterling Construction is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  13,305  in Sterling Construction on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,505  from holding Sterling Construction or generate 26.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Regions Financial  vs.  Sterling Construction

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Regions Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Regions Financial are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Regions Financial reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Sterling Construction 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sterling Construction are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Sterling Construction reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Regions Financial and Sterling Construction Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Regions Financial and Sterling Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite Regions Financial and Sterling Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Regions Financial position performs unexpectedly, Sterling Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sterling Construction will offset losses from the drop in Sterling Construction's long position.
The idea behind Regions Financial and Sterling Construction pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data