Correlation Between Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Investment Grade and Johnson Institutional Intermediate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Investment with a short position of Johnson Institutional. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional

0.98
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Johnson is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Investment Grade and Johnson Institutional Intermed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Johnson Institutional and Guggenheim Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Investment Grade are associated (or correlated) with Johnson Institutional. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Johnson Institutional has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Investment i.e., Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim Investment Grade is expected to generate 1.36 times more return on investment than Johnson Institutional. However, Guggenheim Investment is 1.36 times more volatile than Johnson Institutional Intermediate. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Johnson Institutional Intermediate is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,633  in Guggenheim Investment Grade on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.00  from holding Guggenheim Investment Grade or generate 0.12% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Investment Grade  vs.  Johnson Institutional Intermed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Guggenheim Investment Grade has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Guggenheim Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Johnson Institutional 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Johnson Institutional Intermediate has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Johnson Institutional is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Investment and Johnson Institutional positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Investment position performs unexpectedly, Johnson Institutional can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Johnson Institutional will offset losses from the drop in Johnson Institutional's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Investment Grade and Johnson Institutional Intermediate pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope