Correlation Between Science In and InterContinental

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Science In and InterContinental at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Science In and InterContinental into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Science in Sport and InterContinental Hotels Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Science In and InterContinental and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Science In with a short position of InterContinental. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Science In and InterContinental.

Diversification Opportunities for Science In and InterContinental

0.8

Correlation Coefficient

Science In  InterContinental

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Science and InterContinental is 0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Science in Sport and InterContinental Hotels Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on InterContinental Hotels and Science In is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Science in Sport are associated (or correlated) with InterContinental. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of InterContinental Hotels has no effect on the direction of Science In i.e., Science In and InterContinental go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Science In and InterContinental

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Science In is expected to generate 3.66 times less return on investment than InterContinental. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Science in Sport is 1.1 times less risky than InterContinental. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. InterContinental Hotels Group is currently generating about 0.31 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  802,000  in InterContinental Hotels Group on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  203,000  from holding InterContinental Hotels Group or generate 25.31% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Science in Sport  vs.  InterContinental Hotels Group

Science in Sport

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Science in Sport are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Science In is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

InterContinental Hotels

Risk-Adjusted Performance

24 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in InterContinental Hotels Group are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, InterContinental exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Science In and InterContinental

The main advantage of trading using opposite Science In and InterContinental positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Science In position performs unexpectedly, InterContinental can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in InterContinental will offset losses from the drop in InterContinental's long position.

The idea behind Science in Sport and InterContinental Hotels Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.