Correlation Between Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Samsung Electronics Co and Games Workshop Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Samsung Electronics with a short position of Games Workshop. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop.

Diversification Opportunities for Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop

-0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Samsung and Games is -0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Samsung Electronics Co and Games Workshop Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Games Workshop Group and Samsung Electronics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Samsung Electronics Co are associated (or correlated) with Games Workshop. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Games Workshop Group has no effect on the direction of Samsung Electronics i.e., Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Samsung Electronics Co is expected to under-perform the Games Workshop. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Samsung Electronics Co is 1.1 times less risky than Games Workshop. The stock trades about -0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Games Workshop Group is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,047,533  in Games Workshop Group on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  273,467  from holding Games Workshop Group or generate 26.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Samsung Electronics Co  vs.  Games Workshop Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Samsung Electronics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Samsung Electronics Co has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Games Workshop Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Games Workshop Group are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Games Workshop exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop

The main advantage of trading using opposite Samsung Electronics and Games Workshop positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Samsung Electronics position performs unexpectedly, Games Workshop can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Games Workshop will offset losses from the drop in Games Workshop's long position.
The idea behind Samsung Electronics Co and Games Workshop Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments