Correlation Between Starbucks and Restaurant Brands

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Starbucks and Restaurant Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Starbucks and Restaurant Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Starbucks and Restaurant Brands International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Starbucks and Restaurant Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Starbucks with a short position of Restaurant Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Starbucks and Restaurant Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Starbucks and Restaurant Brands

0.54

Correlation Coefficient

Starbucks  Restaurant Brands

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Starbucks and Restaurant is 0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Starbucks and Restaurant Brands Internationa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Restaurant Brands and Starbucks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Starbucks are associated (or correlated) with Restaurant Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Restaurant Brands has no effect on the direction of Starbucks i.e., Starbucks and Restaurant Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Starbucks and Restaurant Brands

Assuming the 90 days horizon Starbucks is expected to generate 7.64 times less return on investment than Restaurant Brands. In addition to that, Starbucks is 1.05 times more volatile than Restaurant Brands International. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Restaurant Brands International is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  6,272  in Restaurant Brands International on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  10.00  from holding Restaurant Brands International or generate 0.16% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Starbucks  vs.  Restaurant Brands Internationa

Starbucks

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Starbucks has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Starbucks is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Restaurant Brands

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Restaurant Brands International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Starbucks and Restaurant Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Starbucks and Restaurant Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Starbucks position performs unexpectedly, Restaurant Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will offset losses from the drop in Restaurant Brands' long position.

The idea behind Starbucks and Restaurant Brands International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.