Correlation Between Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin Mutual Global and Franklin Servative Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin Mutual with a short position of Franklin Servative. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Franklin is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin Mutual Global and Franklin Servative Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin Servative and Franklin Mutual is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin Mutual Global are associated (or correlated) with Franklin Servative. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin Servative has no effect on the direction of Franklin Mutual i.e., Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative

Assuming the 90 days horizon Franklin Mutual Global is expected to under-perform the Franklin Servative. In addition to that, Franklin Mutual is 3.45 times more volatile than Franklin Servative Allocation. It trades about -0.17 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin Servative Allocation is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,419  in Franklin Servative Allocation on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (20.00) from holding Franklin Servative Allocation or give up 1.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Franklin Mutual Global  vs.  Franklin Servative Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Franklin Mutual Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Franklin Mutual Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's forward indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.
Franklin Servative 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Franklin Servative Allocation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Franklin Servative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin Mutual and Franklin Servative positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin Mutual position performs unexpectedly, Franklin Servative can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin Servative will offset losses from the drop in Franklin Servative's long position.
The idea behind Franklin Mutual Global and Franklin Servative Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm