Correlation Between Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Tyson Foods with a short position of Insurance Australia. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia.

Diversification Opportunities for Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia

0.87

Correlation Coefficient

Tyson Foods  Insurance Australia

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Tyson and Insurance is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Insurance Australia and Tyson Foods is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Tyson Foods are associated (or correlated) with Insurance Australia. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Insurance Australia has no effect on the direction of Tyson Foods i.e., Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Tyson Foods is expected to generate 2.32 times less return on investment than Insurance Australia. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Tyson Foods is 1.07 times less risky than Insurance Australia. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Insurance Australia Group is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  442.00  in Insurance Australia Group on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  58.00  from holding Insurance Australia Group or generate 13.12% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Tyson Foods  vs.  Insurance Australia Group

Tyson Foods

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Tyson Foods are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Tyson Foods is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Insurance Australia

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Insurance Australia Group are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Insurance Australia reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia

The main advantage of trading using opposite Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Tyson Foods position performs unexpectedly, Insurance Australia can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Insurance Australia will offset losses from the drop in Insurance Australia's long position.

The idea behind Tyson Foods and Insurance Australia Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.