Correlation Between Scientific Games and Science Applications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Science Applications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Science Applications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Science Applications International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Science Applications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Science Applications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Science Applications.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Science Applications

0.07
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Science is 0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Science Applications Internati in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Science Applications and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Science Applications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Science Applications has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Science Applications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Science Applications

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to under-perform the Science Applications. In addition to that, Scientific Games is 1.15 times more volatile than Science Applications International. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Science Applications International is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  10,632  in Science Applications International on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (132.00) from holding Science Applications International or give up 1.24% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Science Applications Internati

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Science Applications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Science Applications International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Scientific Games and Science Applications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Science Applications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Science Applications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Science Applications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Science Applications will offset losses from the drop in Science Applications' long position.
The idea behind Scientific Games and Science Applications International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals