Correlation Between Scientific Games and GAMING FAC

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and GAMING FAC at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and GAMING FAC into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and GAMING FAC SA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and GAMING FAC and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of GAMING FAC. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and GAMING FAC.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and GAMING FAC

-0.15

Correlation Coefficient

Scientific Games  GAMING FAC

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and GAMING is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and GAMING FAC SA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GAMING FAC SA and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with GAMING FAC. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GAMING FAC SA has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and GAMING FAC go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and GAMING FAC

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to under-perform the GAMING FAC. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Scientific Games is 1.15 times less risky than GAMING FAC. The stock trades about -0.39 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The GAMING FAC SA is currently generating about -0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  171.00  in GAMING FAC SA on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (16.00) from holding GAMING FAC SA or give up 9.36% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  GAMING FAC SA

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Weak

Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

GAMING FAC SA

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days GAMING FAC SA has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and GAMING FAC

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and GAMING FAC positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, GAMING FAC can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GAMING FAC will offset losses from the drop in GAMING FAC's long position.

The idea behind Scientific Games and GAMING FAC SA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.