Correlation Between Scientific Games and Clean Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Clean Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Clean Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Clean Energy Fuels, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Clean Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Clean Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Clean Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Clean Energy

0.19

Correlation Coefficient

Scientific Games  Clean Energy

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Clean is 0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Clean Energy Fuels in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Clean Energy Fuels and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Clean Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Clean Energy Fuels has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Clean Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Clean Energy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to under-perform the Clean Energy. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Scientific Games is 1.39 times less risky than Clean Energy. The stock trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Clean Energy Fuels is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  256.00  in Clean Energy Fuels on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  35.00  from holding Clean Energy Fuels or generate 13.67% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Clean Energy Fuels

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Clean Energy Fuels

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Clean Energy Fuels are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Clean Energy reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Clean Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Clean Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Clean Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Clean Energy will offset losses from the drop in Clean Energy's long position.

The idea behind Scientific Games and Clean Energy Fuels pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.