Correlation Between Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Allocation Servative and Growth Fund R6, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Allocation with a short position of Growth Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund.
Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund
0.77 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Growth is 0.77. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Allocation Servative and Growth Fund R6 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Growth Fund R6 and Strategic Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Allocation Servative are associated (or correlated) with Growth Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Growth Fund R6 has no effect on the direction of Strategic Allocation i.e., Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund
Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Allocation is expected to generate 2.73 times less return on investment than Growth Fund. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Strategic Allocation Servative is 2.7 times less risky than Growth Fund. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Growth Fund R6 is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 3,665 in Growth Fund R6 on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2,415 from holding Growth Fund R6 or generate 65.89% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Strategic Allocation Servative vs. Growth Fund R6
Performance |
Timeline |
Strategic Allocation |
Growth Fund R6 |
Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund
The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Allocation and Growth Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Growth Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Growth Fund will offset losses from the drop in Growth Fund's long position.The idea behind Strategic Allocation Servative and Growth Fund R6 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Growth Fund vs. Putnam Convertible Incm Gwth | Growth Fund vs. Absolute Convertible Arbitrage | Growth Fund vs. Advent Claymore Convertible | Growth Fund vs. Lord Abbett Convertible |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Other Complementary Tools
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. |