Correlation Between UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between UnitedHealth Group CDR and Thomson Reuters Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in UnitedHealth Group with a short position of Thomson Reuters. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters.

Diversification Opportunities for UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters

-0.33

Correlation Coefficient

UnitedHealth Group  Thomson Reuters

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between UnitedHealth and Thomson is -0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding UnitedHealth Group CDR and Thomson Reuters Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Thomson Reuters Corp and UnitedHealth Group is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on UnitedHealth Group CDR are associated (or correlated) with Thomson Reuters. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Thomson Reuters Corp has no effect on the direction of UnitedHealth Group i.e., UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon UnitedHealth Group is expected to generate 50.79 times less return on investment than Thomson Reuters. In addition to that, UnitedHealth Group is 1.58 times more volatile than Thomson Reuters Corp. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Thomson Reuters Corp is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  18,816  in Thomson Reuters Corp on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5,234  from holding Thomson Reuters Corp or generate 27.82% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

UnitedHealth Group CDR  vs.  Thomson Reuters Corp

UnitedHealth Group CDR

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days UnitedHealth Group CDR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unfluctuating performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Thomson Reuters Corp

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thomson Reuters Corp are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Thomson Reuters is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters

The main advantage of trading using opposite UnitedHealth Group and Thomson Reuters positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if UnitedHealth Group position performs unexpectedly, Thomson Reuters can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Thomson Reuters will offset losses from the drop in Thomson Reuters' long position.

The idea behind UnitedHealth Group CDR and Thomson Reuters Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.