Correlation Between ATMOS and GMS
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between ATMOS ENERGY P and GMS Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on ATMOS and GMS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in ATMOS with a short position of GMS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of ATMOS and GMS.
Diversification Opportunities for ATMOS and GMS
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between ATMOS and GMS is -0.03. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding ATMOS ENERGY P and GMS Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GMS Inc and ATMOS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on ATMOS ENERGY P are associated (or correlated) with GMS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GMS Inc has no effect on the direction of ATMOS i.e., ATMOS and GMS go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between ATMOS and GMS
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon ATMOS ENERGY P is expected to generate 0.41 times more return on investment than GMS. However, ATMOS ENERGY P is 2.46 times less risky than GMS. It trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GMS Inc is currently generating about -0.32 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9,626 in ATMOS ENERGY P on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (300.00) from holding ATMOS ENERGY P or give up 3.12% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 81.82% |
Values | Daily Returns |
ATMOS ENERGY P vs. GMS Inc
Performance |
Timeline |
ATMOS ENERGY P |
GMS Inc |
ATMOS and GMS Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with ATMOS and GMS
The main advantage of trading using opposite ATMOS and GMS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if ATMOS position performs unexpectedly, GMS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GMS will offset losses from the drop in GMS's long position.The idea behind ATMOS ENERGY P and GMS Inc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.GMS vs. Quanex Building Products | GMS vs. Apogee Enterprises | GMS vs. Azek Company | GMS vs. Beacon Roofing Supply |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.
Other Complementary Tools
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |