Correlation Between Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Science Technology Fund and Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Science Technology with a short position of Ftfa Franklin. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin.

Diversification Opportunities for Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin

0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Science and Ftfa is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Science Technology Fund and Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ftfa Franklin Templeton and Science Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Science Technology Fund are associated (or correlated) with Ftfa Franklin. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ftfa Franklin Templeton has no effect on the direction of Science Technology i.e., Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin

Assuming the 90 days horizon Science Technology Fund is expected to generate 2.32 times more return on investment than Ftfa Franklin. However, Science Technology is 2.32 times more volatile than Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,651  in Science Technology Fund on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  295.00  from holding Science Technology Fund or generate 11.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Science Technology Fund  vs.  Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Science Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Science Technology Fund are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Science Technology may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Ftfa Franklin Templeton 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Ftfa Franklin is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin

The main advantage of trading using opposite Science Technology and Ftfa Franklin positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Science Technology position performs unexpectedly, Ftfa Franklin can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ftfa Franklin will offset losses from the drop in Ftfa Franklin's long position.
The idea behind Science Technology Fund and Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments