Correlation Between United States and Cogent Communications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both United States and Cogent Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining United States and Cogent Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between United States Steel and Cogent Communications Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on United States and Cogent Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in United States with a short position of Cogent Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of United States and Cogent Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for United States and Cogent Communications

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between United and Cogent is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding United States Steel and Cogent Communications Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cogent Communications and United States is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on United States Steel are associated (or correlated) with Cogent Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cogent Communications has no effect on the direction of United States i.e., United States and Cogent Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between United States and Cogent Communications

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon United States Steel is expected to under-perform the Cogent Communications. In addition to that, United States is 1.38 times more volatile than Cogent Communications Holdings. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Cogent Communications Holdings is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  6,666  in Cogent Communications Holdings on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  534.00  from holding Cogent Communications Holdings or generate 8.01% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

United States Steel  vs.  Cogent Communications Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
United States Steel 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days United States Steel has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, United States is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cogent Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile primary indicators, Cogent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

United States and Cogent Communications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with United States and Cogent Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite United States and Cogent Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if United States position performs unexpectedly, Cogent Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cogent Communications will offset losses from the drop in Cogent Communications' long position.
The idea behind United States Steel and Cogent Communications Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio