Correlation Between Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Verizon Communications and The Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Verizon Communications with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

0.73

Correlation Coefficient

Verizon Communications  Procter Gamble

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Verizon and Procter is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Verizon Communications and The Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Verizon Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Verizon Communications are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Verizon Communications i.e., Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Verizon Communications is expected to generate 1.29 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Verizon Communications is 1.29 times more volatile than The Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,972  in Verizon Communications on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  447.00  from holding Verizon Communications or generate 11.25% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Verizon Communications  vs.  The Procter Gamble

Verizon Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Verizon Communications are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Verizon Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in The Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat uncertain fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Verizon Communications and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Verizon Communications position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Verizon Communications and The Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.