Correlation Between Where Food and Ming Shing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Where Food and Ming Shing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Where Food and Ming Shing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Where Food Comes and Ming Shing Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Where Food and Ming Shing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Where Food with a short position of Ming Shing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Where Food and Ming Shing.

Diversification Opportunities for Where Food and Ming Shing

0.79
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Where and Ming is 0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Where Food Comes and Ming Shing Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ming Shing Group and Where Food is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Where Food Comes are associated (or correlated) with Ming Shing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ming Shing Group has no effect on the direction of Where Food i.e., Where Food and Ming Shing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Where Food and Ming Shing

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Where Food Comes is expected to generate 0.22 times more return on investment than Ming Shing. However, Where Food Comes is 4.64 times less risky than Ming Shing. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ming Shing Group is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,090  in Where Food Comes on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  155.00  from holding Where Food Comes or generate 14.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy32.31%
ValuesDaily Returns

Where Food Comes  vs.  Ming Shing Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Where Food Comes 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Where Food Comes are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile fundamental indicators, Where Food reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Ming Shing Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ming Shing Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.

Where Food and Ming Shing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Where Food and Ming Shing

The main advantage of trading using opposite Where Food and Ming Shing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Where Food position performs unexpectedly, Ming Shing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ming Shing will offset losses from the drop in Ming Shing's long position.
The idea behind Where Food Comes and Ming Shing Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals