Correlation Between Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy Transition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Waterstone Financial with a short position of Nabors Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy

-0.4
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Waterstone and Nabors is -0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy Transition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nabors Energy Transition and Waterstone Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Waterstone Financial are associated (or correlated) with Nabors Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nabors Energy Transition has no effect on the direction of Waterstone Financial i.e., Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Waterstone Financial is expected to under-perform the Nabors Energy. In addition to that, Waterstone Financial is 9.71 times more volatile than Nabors Energy Transition. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Nabors Energy Transition is currently generating about 0.26 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,066  in Nabors Energy Transition on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  29.00  from holding Nabors Energy Transition or generate 2.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Waterstone Financial  vs.  Nabors Energy Transition

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Waterstone Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Waterstone Financial has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest unsteady performance, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.
Nabors Energy Transition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nabors Energy Transition are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, Nabors Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Waterstone Financial position performs unexpectedly, Nabors Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nabors Energy will offset losses from the drop in Nabors Energy's long position.
The idea behind Waterstone Financial and Nabors Energy Transition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum