Correlation Between Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Zapata Computing Holdings and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Zapata Computing with a short position of Fidelity Advisor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor.

Diversification Opportunities for Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor

-0.49

Correlation Coefficient

Zapata Computing  Fidelity Advisor

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Zapata and Fidelity is -0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Zapata Computing Holdings and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Advisor Sem and Zapata Computing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Zapata Computing Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Advisor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Advisor Sem has no effect on the direction of Zapata Computing i.e., Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Zapata Computing Holdings is expected to under-perform the Fidelity Advisor. In addition to that, Zapata Computing is 10.29 times more volatile than Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors. It trades about -0.27 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  8,360  in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  861.00  from holding Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors or generate 10.3% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	70.31%
Values	Daily Returns

Zapata Computing Holdings  vs.  Fidelity Advisor Semiconductor

Zapata Computing Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Zapata Computing Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Fidelity Advisor Sem

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Fidelity Advisor may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Zapata Computing and Fidelity Advisor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Zapata Computing position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Advisor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Advisor will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Advisor's long position.

The idea behind Zapata Computing Holdings and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.