Banks Ultrasector Profund Fund Cash Position Weight

BKPIX Fund  USD 64.63  2.12  3.18%   
Banks Ultrasector Profund fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Banks Ultrasector's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Banks Mutual Fund. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Banks Ultrasector's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Banks Ultrasector mutual fund.
  
This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools.

Banks Ultrasector Profund Mutual Fund Cash Position Weight Analysis

Banks Ultrasector's Percentage of fund asset invested in cash equivalents or risk-free instruments. About 40% of all global funds carry cash on their balance sheet.

Cash Percentage

 = 

% of Cash

in the fund

More About Cash Position Weight | All Equity Analysis

Current Banks Ultrasector Cash Position Weight

    
  23.52 %  
Most of Banks Ultrasector's fundamental indicators, such as Cash Position Weight, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Banks Ultrasector Profund is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Funds or ETFs that have over 40% of their value invested in low-risk instruments or cash equivalents typically attract conservative investors.
Competition

Banks Ultrasector Cash Position Weight Component Assessment

In accordance with the recently published financial statements, Banks Ultrasector Profund has 23.52% in Cash Position Weight. This is 14.72% lower than that of the ProFunds family and 10.91% lower than that of the Family category. The cash position weight for all United States funds is 121.68% lower than that of the firm.

Banks Cash Position Weight Peer Comparison

Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Banks Ultrasector's direct or indirect competition against its Cash Position Weight to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the mutual funds which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Banks Ultrasector could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Banks Ultrasector by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.
Banks Ultrasector is currently under evaluation in cash position weight among similar funds.

Fund Asset Allocation for Banks Ultrasector

The fund consists of 74.75% investments in stocks, with the rest of investments allocated between different money market instruments and various exotic instruments.
Asset allocation divides Banks Ultrasector's investment portfolio among different asset categories to balance risk and reward by investing in a diversified mix of instruments that align with the investor's goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Mutual funds, which pool money from multiple investors to buy a diversified portfolio of securities, use asset allocation strategies to manage the risk and return of their portfolios.
Mutual funds allocate their assets by investing in a diversified portfolio of securities, such as stocks, bonds, cryptocurrencies and cash. The specific mix of these securities is determined by the fund's investment objective and strategy. For example, a stock mutual fund may invest primarily in equities, while a bond mutual fund may invest mainly in fixed-income securities. The fund's manager, responsible for making investment decisions, will buy and sell securities in the fund's portfolio as market conditions and the fund's objectives change.

Banks Fundamentals

About Banks Ultrasector Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Banks Ultrasector Profund's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Banks Ultrasector using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Banks Ultrasector Profund based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this mutual fund, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.

Other Information on Investing in Banks Mutual Fund

Banks Ultrasector financial ratios help investors to determine whether Banks Mutual Fund is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Banks with respect to the benefits of owning Banks Ultrasector security.
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm