Chargepoint Holdings Stock Piotroski F Score

CHPT Stock  USD 1.24  0.10  8.77%   
This module uses fundamental data of ChargePoint Holdings to approximate its Piotroski F score. ChargePoint Holdings F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of ChargePoint Holdings. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about ChargePoint Holdings financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out ChargePoint Holdings Altman Z Score, ChargePoint Holdings Correlation, ChargePoint Holdings Valuation, as well as analyze ChargePoint Holdings Alpha and Beta and ChargePoint Holdings Hype Analysis.
For more information on how to buy ChargePoint Stock please use our How to Invest in ChargePoint Holdings guide.
  
At this time, ChargePoint Holdings' Net Debt To EBITDA is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Interest Debt Per Share is likely to gain to 2.52 in 2024, whereas Long Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 221.2 M in 2024. At this time, ChargePoint Holdings' ROE is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Net Debt To EBITDA is likely to gain to 0.47 in 2024, whereas Book Value Per Share is likely to drop (0.05) in 2024.
At this time, it appears that ChargePoint Holdings' Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
5.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
Current Return On Assets

Negative

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Decreased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Negative

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Decrease

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Lower Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Decrease

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

Increase

Focus

ChargePoint Holdings Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to ChargePoint Holdings is to make sure ChargePoint is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if ChargePoint Holdings' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if ChargePoint Holdings' financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Asset Turnover0.50.4592
Significantly Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.220.0594
Way Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities224 M330.2 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total277.5 M445.5 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets785.3 M1.1 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets512.4 M742.7 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile

ChargePoint Holdings F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between ChargePoint Holdings' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards ChargePoint Holdings in a much-optimized way.

About ChargePoint Holdings Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Book Value Per Share

0.87

At this time, ChargePoint Holdings' Book Value Per Share is comparatively stable compared to the past year.

ChargePoint Holdings Current Valuation Drivers

We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of ChargePoint Holdings from analyzing ChargePoint Holdings' financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess ChargePoint Holdings' ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of ChargePoint Holdings' important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Market Cap42.4M87.2M605.9M4.1B4.1B713.5M

About ChargePoint Holdings Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze ChargePoint Holdings's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of ChargePoint Holdings using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of ChargePoint Holdings based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Thematic Opportunities

Explore Investment Opportunities

Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
Explore Investing Ideas  

Additional Tools for ChargePoint Stock Analysis

When running ChargePoint Holdings' price analysis, check to measure ChargePoint Holdings' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy ChargePoint Holdings is operating at the current time. Most of ChargePoint Holdings' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of ChargePoint Holdings' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move ChargePoint Holdings' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of ChargePoint Holdings to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.