KAPR Etf | | | USD 34.25 0.08 0.23% |
This module uses fundamental data of Innovator Russell to approximate its Piotroski F score. Innovator Russell F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Innovator Russell 2000. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Innovator Russell financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out
Innovator Russell Altman Z Score,
Innovator Russell Correlation,
Portfolio Optimization, as well as analyze
Innovator Russell Alpha and Beta and
Innovator Russell Hype Analysis.
At this time, it appears that Innovator Russell's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized
Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of
predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
0.0
Piotroski F Score - Inapplicable
| Current Return On Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Change in Return on Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | N/A | Focus |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | N/A | Focus |
| Asset Turnover Growth | N/A | Focus |
| Current Ratio Change | N/A | Focus |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | N/A | Focus |
| Change In Outstending Shares | N/A | Focus |
| Change in Gross Margin | N/A | Focus |
Innovator Russell Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Innovator Russell is to make sure Innovator is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Innovator Russell's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Innovator Russell's financial numbers are properly reported.
About Innovator Russell Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled
Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
About Innovator Russell Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Innovator Russell 2000's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Innovator Russell using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of Innovator Russell 2000 based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this etf, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Innovator Russell
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Innovator Russell position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Innovator Russell will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Innovator Russell could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Innovator Russell when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Innovator Russell - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Innovator Russell 2000 to buy it.
The correlation of Innovator Russell is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Innovator Russell moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Innovator Russell 2000 moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Innovator Russell can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation MatchingWhen determining whether Innovator Russell 2000 is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company
management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A
comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Innovator Etf is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Innovator Russell 2000 Etf.
Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Innovator Russell 2000 Etf: The market value of Innovator Russell 2000 is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Innovator that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Innovator Russell's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Innovator Russell's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Innovator Russell's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Innovator Russell's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Innovator Russell's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Innovator Russell is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Innovator Russell's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.