Affiliated Managers Group, Stock Beneish M Score

MGRD Stock  USD 16.20  0.09  0.55%   
This module uses fundamental data of Affiliated Managers to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Affiliated Managers M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Affiliated Managers Piotroski F Score and Affiliated Managers Altman Z Score analysis.
  
At present, Affiliated Managers' Net Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Net Debt To EBITDA is expected to grow to 1.67, whereas Long Term Debt is forecasted to decline to about 2.3 B. At present, Affiliated Managers' Days Sales Outstanding is projected to drop based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Book Value Per Share is expected to grow to 148.48, whereas PTB Ratio is forecasted to decline to 1.41.
At this time, it appears that Affiliated Managers is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Affiliated Managers' top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Affiliated Managers executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Affiliated Managers' earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-2.89
Beneish M Score - Unlikely Manipulator
Elasticity of Receivables

0.97

Focus
Asset Quality

0.81

Focus
Expense Coverage

1.17

Focus
Gross Margin Strengs

1.38

Focus
Accruals Factor

1.17

Focus
Depreciation Resistance

1.01

Focus
Net Sales Growth

0.74

Focus
Financial Leverage Condition

1.87

Focus

Affiliated Managers Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends

The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Affiliated Managers' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Net Receivables264.4 M368.4 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Revenue1.5 B2.1 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets5.1 B9.1 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets1.7 B1.6 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Non Current Assets Total4.3 B7.4 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Property Plant Equipment68.8 M71.6 M
Sufficiently Down
Slightly volatile
Depreciation And Amortization58.2 M61.3 M
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Selling General Administrative321.6 M369.1 M
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Total Current Liabilities439.9 M410.7 M
Notably Up
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities TotalB3.7 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Short Term Debt37.1 M39.1 M
Notably Down
Very volatile
Long Term Debt2.3 B2.7 B
Fairly Down
Slightly volatile
Operating Income541.4 M792.1 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Short Term Investments484.1 M461 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Long Term Investments1.9 B2.1 B
Moderately Down
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.770.559
Significantly Up
Pretty Stable

Affiliated Managers Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Affiliated Managers' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Affiliated Managers in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Affiliated Managers' degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.

About Affiliated Managers Beneish M Score

M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.

Depreciation And Amortization

58.23 Million

At present, Affiliated Managers' Depreciation And Amortization is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.

Affiliated Managers Earnings Manipulation Drivers

Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Affiliated Managers. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Net Receivables417.1M421.6M419.2M316M368.4M264.4M
Total Revenue2.2B2.0B2.4B2.3B2.1B1.5B
Total Assets7.7B7.9B8.9B8.9B9.1B5.1B
Total Current Assets1.0B1.5B1.4B1.5B1.6B1.7B
Non Current Assets Total6.6B6.4B7.5B7.4B7.4B4.3B
Depreciation And Amortization165.8M1.4B1.5B1.5B61.3M58.2M
Selling General Administrative373.1M417.7M376.8M321M369.2M321.6M
Total Current Liabilities634.6M712.4M789.1M778.3M410.7M439.9M
Non Current Liabilities Total2.6B3.2B3.7B3.5B3.7B2.0B
Net Debt1.3B1.3B1.6B2.1B1.7B1.8B
Short Term Debt449.7M40.5M38.9M38.5M39.1M37.1M
Operating Income359M566.6M1.1B1.8B792.1M541.4M
Total Cash From Operating Activities484.2M(1.7B)1.3B1.1B874.3M504.9M
Short Term Investments59.4M74.9M78.5M716.9M461M484.1M

Affiliated Managers ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Affiliated Managers' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Affiliated Managers' managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Affiliated Managers Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Affiliated Managers Group,'s financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Affiliated Managers using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Affiliated Managers Group, based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
When determining whether Affiliated Managers is a strong investment it is important to analyze Affiliated Managers' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Affiliated Managers' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Affiliated Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Affiliated Managers Piotroski F Score and Affiliated Managers Altman Z Score analysis.
You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.
Is Trading space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Affiliated Managers. If investors know Affiliated will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Affiliated Managers listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Affiliated Managers is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Affiliated that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Affiliated Managers' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Affiliated Managers' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Affiliated Managers' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Affiliated Managers' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Affiliated Managers' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Affiliated Managers is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Affiliated Managers' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.