Planet Green Holdings Stock Piotroski F Score
| PLAG Stock | USD 2.62 0.03 1.13% |
Planet | Piotroski F Score |
At this time, it appears that Planet Green's Piotroski F Score is Poor. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
4.0
Piotroski F Score - Poor
| Current Return On Assets | Negative |
| Change in Return on Assets | Decreased |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | Negative |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | Improving |
| Asset Turnover Growth | Increase |
| Current Ratio Change | Decrease |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | Lower Leverage |
| Change In Outstending Shares | Decrease |
| Change in Gross Margin | No Change |
Planet Green Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Planet Green is to make sure Planet is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Planet Green's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Planet Green's financial numbers are properly reported.
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.73 | 0.6362 |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 31.9 M | 19.2 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Assets | 40.5 M | 42.6 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Assets | 11.9 M | 12.5 M |
|
|
Planet Green Holdings F Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Planet Green's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Planet Green in a much-optimized way.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Planet Green Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.Book Value Per Share |
|
Planet Green Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Planet Green from analyzing Planet Green's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Planet Green's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Planet Green's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
| Market Cap | 18.9M | 22.6M | 25.3M | 36.9M | 35.2M | 33.5M | |
| Enterprise Value | 12.0M | 19.2M | 31.8M | 40.7M | 38.6M | 36.7M |
Planet Green ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Planet Green's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Planet Green's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
About Planet Green Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Planet Green Holdings's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Planet Green using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Planet Green Holdings based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
When determining whether Planet Green Holdings is a strong investment it is important to analyze Planet Green's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Planet Green's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Planet Stock, refer to the following important reports:Check out Planet Green Altman Z Score, Planet Green Correlation, Planet Green Valuation, as well as analyze Planet Green Alpha and Beta and Planet Green Hype Analysis. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..
Is Packaged Foods & Meats space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Planet Green. If investors know Planet will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Planet Green listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share (1.47) | Revenue Per Share 2.426 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.57) | Return On Assets (0.12) | Return On Equity (0.49) |
The market value of Planet Green Holdings is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Planet that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Planet Green's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Planet Green's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Planet Green's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Planet Green's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Planet Green's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Planet Green is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Planet Green's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.