Rocky Mountain Chocolate Stock Piotroski F Score

RMCF Stock  USD 2.86  0.12  4.38%   
This module uses fundamental data of Rocky Mountain to approximate its Piotroski F score. Rocky Mountain F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Rocky Mountain Chocolate. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Rocky Mountain financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Rocky Mountain Altman Z Score, Rocky Mountain Correlation, Rocky Mountain Valuation, as well as analyze Rocky Mountain Alpha and Beta and Rocky Mountain Hype Analysis.
  
At this time, Rocky Mountain's Long Term Debt To Capitalization is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. At this time, Rocky Mountain's PTB Ratio is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The Rocky Mountain's current Stock Based Compensation To Revenue is estimated to increase to 0.02, while Book Value Per Share is projected to decrease to 1.57.
At this time, it appears that Rocky Mountain's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
6.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
Current Return On Assets

Negative

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Increased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Negative

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Increase

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Lower Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Decrease

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

No Change

Focus

Rocky Mountain Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Rocky Mountain is to make sure Rocky is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Rocky Mountain's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Rocky Mountain's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Asset Turnover1.511.3583
Moderately Up
Pretty Stable
Gross Profit Margin0.160.1686
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities4.4 M8.1 M
Way Down
Very volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total2.8 M1.9 M
Way Up
Very volatile
Total Assets20.7 M20.6 M
Slightly Up
Very volatile
Total Current Assets10.4 M9.6 M
Significantly Up
Very volatile

Rocky Mountain Chocolate F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Rocky Mountain's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Rocky Mountain in a much-optimized way.

About Rocky Mountain Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Book Value Per Share

1.57

At this time, Rocky Mountain's Book Value Per Share is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years.

Rocky Mountain ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Rocky Mountain's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Rocky Mountain's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Rocky Mountain Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Rocky Mountain Chocolate's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Rocky Mountain using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Rocky Mountain Chocolate based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether Rocky Mountain Chocolate is a strong investment it is important to analyze Rocky Mountain's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Rocky Mountain's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Rocky Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Is Packaged Foods & Meats space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Rocky Mountain. If investors know Rocky will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Rocky Mountain listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.86)
Earnings Share
(0.74)
Revenue Per Share
4.331
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.03)
Return On Assets
(0.11)
The market value of Rocky Mountain Chocolate is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Rocky that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Rocky Mountain's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Rocky Mountain's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Rocky Mountain's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Rocky Mountain's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Rocky Mountain's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Rocky Mountain is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Rocky Mountain's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.