Sezzle Common Stock Stock Piotroski F Score
| SEZL Stock | 414.95 13.51 3.15% |
Sezzle | Piotroski F Score |
At this time, it appears that Sezzle Common's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
5.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
| Current Return On Assets | Positive |
| Change in Return on Assets | Increased |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | Negative |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | Decreasing |
| Asset Turnover Growth | Increase |
| Current Ratio Change | Decrease |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | Lower Leverage |
| Change In Outstending Shares | Decrease |
| Change in Gross Margin | No Change |
Sezzle Common Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Sezzle Common is to make sure Sezzle is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Sezzle Common's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Sezzle Common's financial numbers are properly reported.
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.79 | 0.7494 |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 196.6 M | 187.3 M |
|
| |||||
| Non Current Liabilities Total | 3.1 M | 3.3 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Assets | 125.6 M | 212.6 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Assets | 124 M | 209 M |
|
|
Sezzle Common Stock F Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Sezzle Common's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Sezzle Common in a much-optimized way.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Sezzle Common Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.Book Value Per Share |
|
Sezzle Common Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Sezzle Common from analyzing Sezzle Common's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Sezzle Common's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Sezzle Common's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
| Market Cap | 238.1M | 398.7M | 427.5M | 441.4M | 115.0M | 109.3M | |
| Enterprise Value | 224.7M | 355.7M | 428.4M | 437.2M | 143.1M | 135.9M |
Sezzle Common ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Sezzle Common's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Sezzle Common's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
About Sezzle Common Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Sezzle Common Stock's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Sezzle Common using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Sezzle Common Stock based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Sezzle Common Altman Z Score, Sezzle Common Correlation, Sezzle Common Valuation, as well as analyze Sezzle Common Alpha and Beta and Sezzle Common Hype Analysis. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Is Transaction & Payment Processing Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Sezzle Common. If investors know Sezzle will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Sezzle Common listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 10.472 | Earnings Share 9.46 | Revenue Per Share 39.331 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.713 | Return On Assets 0.2895 |
The market value of Sezzle Common Stock is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Sezzle that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Sezzle Common's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Sezzle Common's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Sezzle Common's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Sezzle Common's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Sezzle Common's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Sezzle Common is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Sezzle Common's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.