This module uses fundamental data of Technology Minerals to approximate its Piotroski F score. Technology Minerals F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Technology Minerals PLC. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Technology Minerals financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Technology Minerals PLC. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of economic analysis.
Technology
Piotroski F Score
Change In Cash
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Other Non Cash Items
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Change To Account Receivables
Net Income
End Period Cash Flow
Total Assets
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Net Debt
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Cash
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Cash And Short Term Investments
Net Receivables
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Current Assets
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Liab
Net Invested Capital
Total Current Assets
Capital Stock
Net Working Capital
Common Stock
Depreciation And Amortization
Ebit
Ebitda
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At present, Technology Minerals' Short and Long Term Debt Total is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Long Term Debt is expected to grow to about 1.9 M, whereas Short and Long Term Debt is forecasted to decline to 0.00.
At this time, it appears that Technology Minerals' Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Technology Minerals is to make sure Technology is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Technology Minerals' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Technology Minerals' financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Technology Minerals' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Technology Minerals in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Net Debt
1.5 Million
At present, Technology Minerals' Net Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.
About Technology Minerals Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Technology Minerals PLC's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Technology Minerals using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Technology Minerals PLC based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
Other Information on Investing in Technology Stock
Technology Minerals financial ratios help investors to determine whether Technology Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Technology with respect to the benefits of owning Technology Minerals security.