Trustmark Stock Beneish M Score

TRMK Stock  USD 38.30  0.68  1.74%   
This module uses fundamental data of Trustmark to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Trustmark M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Trustmark Piotroski F Score and Trustmark Altman Z Score analysis.
For more information on how to buy Trustmark Stock please use our How to buy in Trustmark Stock guide.
  
At this time, Trustmark's Debt Equity Ratio is quite stable compared to the past year. Cash Flow To Debt Ratio is expected to rise to 0.37 this year, although the value of Short Term Debt will most likely fall to about 317.4 M. At this time, Trustmark's Stock Based Compensation To Revenue is quite stable compared to the past year. Capex To Depreciation is expected to rise to 1.43 this year, although the value of EV To Sales will most likely fall to 1.75.
At this time, it appears that Trustmark is a possible manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Trustmark's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Trustmark executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Trustmark's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-1.73
Beneish M Score - Possible Manipulator
Elasticity of Receivables

1.81

Focus
Asset Quality

1.0

Focus
Expense Coverage

1.0

Focus
Gross Margin Strengs

0.89

Focus
Accruals Factor

1.0

Focus
Depreciation Resistance

0.84

Focus
Net Sales Growth

0.58

Focus
Financial Leverage Condition

-0.26

Focus

Trustmark Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends

The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Trustmark's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Net Receivables14.7 B14 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Revenue441.9 M759.8 M
Way Down
Pretty Stable
Total Assets10.5 B18.7 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets926.8 M975.5 M
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Assets Total18.6 B17.7 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Property Plant Equipment173.9 M244.2 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Depreciation And Amortization15.6 M18.1 M
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Selling General Administrative181.2 M310.9 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities317.4 M411.3 M
Significantly Down
Very volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total17.9 B17 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Short Term Debt317.4 M411.3 M
Significantly Down
Very volatile
Long Term Debt614.7 M585.4 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Operating Income241.4 M210.8 M
Fairly Up
Pretty Stable
Total Cash From Operating Activities145.4 M196.9 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Short Term Investments1.6 B1.8 B
Significantly Down
Very volatile
Long Term Investments4.3 B3.2 B
Significantly Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.780.88
Fairly Down
Slightly volatile

Trustmark Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Trustmark's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Trustmark in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Trustmark's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.

About Trustmark Beneish M Score

M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.

Depreciation And Amortization

15.59 Million

At this time, Trustmark's Depreciation And Amortization is quite stable compared to the past year.

Trustmark Earnings Manipulation Drivers

Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Trustmark. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Net Receivables79.4M9.8B10.2B12.2B14.0B14.7B
Total Revenue549.3M622.1M555.4M46.5M759.8M441.9M
Total Assets13.5B16.6B17.6B18.0B18.7B10.5B
Total Current Assets2.0B3.9B5.5B619.8M975.5M926.8M
Net Debt(179.3M)(1.6B)(2.0B)540.2M(344.2M)(327.0M)
Short Term Debt32.4M32.3M36.5M38.9M411.3M317.4M
Long Term Debt147.3M353.0M275.9M1.2B585.4M614.7M
Operating Income173.8M189.8M175.4M84.2M210.8M241.4M
Investments(61.7M)(1.2B)(1.3B)(2.3B)(900.0M)(945.0M)

Trustmark ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Trustmark's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Trustmark's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Trustmark Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Trustmark's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Trustmark using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Trustmark based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect
When determining whether Trustmark is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Trustmark Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Trustmark Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Trustmark Stock:
Check out Trustmark Piotroski F Score and Trustmark Altman Z Score analysis.
For more information on how to buy Trustmark Stock please use our How to buy in Trustmark Stock guide.
You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Is Regional Banks space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Trustmark. If investors know Trustmark will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Trustmark listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.506
Dividend Share
0.92
Earnings Share
0.57
Revenue Per Share
9.086
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.111
The market value of Trustmark is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Trustmark that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Trustmark's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Trustmark's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Trustmark's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Trustmark's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Trustmark's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Trustmark is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Trustmark's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.