Waste Management Net Worth
Waste Management Net Worth Breakdown | WM |
Waste Management Net Worth Analysis
Waste Management's net worth analysis, or its valuation, is the process of determining the total value of the company. This involves assessing a range of factors, including Waste Management's financial performance, assets, liabilities, and potential for growth. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear understanding of Waste Management's overall worth, which can help investors make informed investment decisions. There are several methods that can be used to perform Waste Management's net worth analysis. One common approach is to calculate Waste Management's market capitalization.Another approach is to use the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio), which compares Waste Management's stock price to its earnings per share (EPS). Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is another popular method for assessing Waste Management's net worth. This approach calculates the present value of Waste Management's future cash flows, taking into account factors such as growth rate, profitability, and risk. By comparing the present value of Waste Management's cash flows to its current stock price, investors can gain a better understanding of the company's overall value. Finally, investors may use comparable company analysis to evaluate Waste Management's net worth. This involves comparing Waste Management's financial metrics to similar companies in the same industry. By identifying companies with similar financial characteristics, investors can gain insight into Waste Management's net worth relative to its peers.
Enterprise Value |
|
To determine if Waste Management is a good investment, evaluating the company's potential for future growth is also very important. This may include expanding into new markets, launching new products or services, or improving operational efficiency. Companies with strong growth prospects can be more attractive investments. This aspect of the research should be conducted in the context of the overall market and industry in which the company operates and should include an analysis of growth potential, competitive landscape, and any regulatory or economic factors that could impact the business. Some of the essential points regarding Waste Management's net worth research are outlined below:
Waste Management reports 16.23 B of total liabilities with total debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 2.01, which may imply that the company relies heavily on debt financing. Waste Management has a current ratio of 0.83, implying that it has not enough working capital to pay out debt commitments in time. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for Waste to invest in growth at high rates of return. | |
Waste Management has a strong financial position based on the latest SEC filings | |
Over 84.0% of Waste Management outstanding shares are owned by institutional investors | |
Latest headline from businesswire.com: Disposition of 1860 shares by Kimberly Stith of Waste Management at 204.7585 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Waste Management Quarterly Good Will |
|
Waste Management uses earnings reports to provide investors with an update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Therefore, it is also crucial when considering investing in Waste Management. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent period. It also may provide a comparison to Waste Management's previous reporting period. The quarterly earnings reports are usually disseminated to the public via Form 10-Q, which is a legal document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter.
12th of February 2024 Upcoming Quarterly Report | View | |
24th of April 2024 Next Financial Report | View | |
31st of December 2023 Next Fiscal Quarter End | View | |
12th of February 2024 Next Fiscal Year End | View | |
30th of September 2023 Last Quarter Report | View | |
31st of December 2022 Last Financial Announcement | View |
Waste Management Target Price Consensus
Waste target price is determined by taking all analyst projections and averaging them out. There is no one specific way to measure analysts' performance other than comparing it to past results via a very sophisticated attribution analysis. Waste Management's target price projections below should be used in combination with other traditional price prediction techniques such as stock price forecasting, investor sentiment analysis, technical analysis, earnings estimate, and various momentum models.
23 | Buy |
Most Waste analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to help potential investors understand Waste stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching the public financial statements of Waste Management, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to those companies' conference calls.
Macroaxis Advice Exposure ValuationWaste Management Target Price Projection
Waste Management's current and average target prices are 228.46 and 179.56, respectively. The current price of Waste Management is the price at which Waste Management is currently trading. On the other hand, Waste Management's target price is what analysts think the stock is worth or could sell for in the future. The more significant the discrepancy between the two prices, the more it stimulates investors to act.Current Price
Waste Management Market Quote on 28th of November 2024
Target Price
Analyst Consensus On Waste Management Target Price
Know Waste Management's Top Institutional Investors
Have you ever been surprised when a price of an equity instrument such as Waste Management is soaring high without any particular reason? This is usually happening because many institutional investors are aggressively trading Waste Management backward and forwards among themselves. Waste Management's institutional investor refers to the entity that pools money to purchase Waste Management's securities or originate loans. Institutional investors include commercial and private banks, credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and mutual funds. Operating companies that invest excess capital in these types of assets may also be included in the term and may influence corporate governance by exercising voting rights in their investments.
Shares | Wells Fargo & Co | 2024-06-30 | 4.1 M | Nordea Investment Mgmt Bank Demark A/s | 2024-09-30 | 4 M | Legal & General Group Plc | 2024-06-30 | 3.8 M | Pictet Asset Manangement Sa | 2024-06-30 | 3.7 M | Lazard Asset Management Llc | 2024-06-30 | 3.6 M | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-09-30 | 3.5 M | Amundi | 2024-06-30 | 3.4 M | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2024-06-30 | 2.9 M | Clearbridge Advisors, Llc | 2024-09-30 | 2.7 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2024-09-30 | 36.8 M | Gates Bill & Melinda Foundation | 2024-09-30 | 32.2 M |
Follow Waste Management's market capitalization trends
The company currently falls under 'Large-Cap' category with a market capitalization of 91.29 B.Market Cap |
|
Project Waste Management's profitablity
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.10 | 0.11 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.13 | 0.12 | |
Return On Assets | 0.07 | 0.04 | |
Return On Equity | 0.33 | 0.35 |
When accessing Waste Management's net worth, it's important to look at multiple sources and consider different scenarios. For example, gross profit margin measures Waste Management's profitability after accounting for the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin measures profitability after accounting for all expenses. Other important metrics include return on assets, return on equity, and free cash flow. By reviewing multiple sources and metrics, you can gain a complete picture of Waste Management's profitability and make more informed investment decisions.
Evaluate Waste Management's management efficiency
Waste Management has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0795 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0795. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.3503 %, which means that it produced $0.3503 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Waste Management's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Waste Management manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Waste Management's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 28th of November 2024, Return On Equity is likely to grow to 0.35, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.12. At this time, Waste Management's Non Currrent Assets Other are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 28th of November 2024, Intangible Assets is likely to grow to about 963.3 M, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop about 15.6 B.Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Book Value Per Share | 17.03 | 17.88 | |
Tangible Book Value Per Share | (7.70) | (7.31) | |
Enterprise Value Over EBITDA | 15.43 | 11.58 | |
Price Book Value Ratio | 10.51 | 11.03 | |
Enterprise Value Multiple | 15.43 | 11.58 | |
Price Fair Value | 10.51 | 11.03 | |
Enterprise Value | 22.4 B | 23.5 B |
Waste Management has shown resilience through effective management strategies. Our analysis examines how these strategies influence financial outcomes and investor returns which helps in understanding the stock's long-term potential.
Enterprise Value Revenue 5.0185 | Revenue 21.4 B | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.079 | Revenue Per Share 53.245 | Return On Equity 0.3503 |
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Waste Management insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Waste Management's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases Waste Management insiders are required to file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Waste Management Corporate Filings
F4 | 27th of November 2024 The report filed by a party regarding the acquisition or disposition of a company's common stock, as well as derivative securities such as options, warrants, and convertible securities | ViewVerify |
8K | 8th of November 2024 Report filed with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about | ViewVerify |
31st of October 2024 Other Reports | ViewVerify | |
30th of October 2024 Other Reports | ViewVerify |
Waste Management Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Waste Management's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Waste Management is estimated to be 1.82 with the future projection ranging from a low of 1.8 to a high of 1.8625. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Waste Management is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
1.80 Lowest | Expected EPS | 1.86 Highest |
Waste Management Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Waste Management's value are higher than the current market price of the Waste Management stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Waste Management is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Waste Management's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of December 2024 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
23 | 95.09% | 1.96 | 1.82 | 6.55 |
Waste Management Earnings History
Earnings estimate consensus by Waste Management analysts from Wall Street is used by the market to judge Waste Management's stock performance. Investors also use these earnings estimates to evaluate and project the stock performance into the future in order to make their investment decisions. However, we recommend analyzing not only Waste Management's upcoming profit reports and earnings-per-share forecasts but also comparing them to our different valuation methods.Waste Management Quarterly Gross Profit |
|
Waste Management Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Waste Management refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Waste Management predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Waste Management, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Waste Management Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Waste Management, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Waste Management should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Waste Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Waste Management's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-10-28 | 2024-09-30 | 1.89 | 1.96 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2024-07-24 | 2024-06-30 | 1.83 | 1.82 | -0.01 | 0 | ||
2024-04-24 | 2024-03-31 | 1.51 | 1.75 | 0.24 | 15 | ||
2024-02-12 | 2023-12-31 | 1.53 | 1.74 | 0.21 | 13 | ||
2023-10-24 | 2023-09-30 | 1.61 | 1.63 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2023-07-25 | 2023-06-30 | 1.54 | 1.51 | -0.03 | 1 | ||
2023-04-26 | 2023-03-31 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2023-01-31 | 2022-12-31 | 1.41 | 1.3 | -0.11 | 7 | ||
2022-10-26 | 2022-09-30 | 1.51 | 1.56 | 0.05 | 3 | ||
2022-07-27 | 2022-06-30 | 1.4 | 1.44 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2022-04-26 | 2022-03-31 | 1.14 | 1.29 | 0.15 | 13 | ||
2022-02-02 | 2021-12-31 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2021-10-26 | 2021-09-30 | 1.36 | 1.26 | -0.1 | 7 | ||
2021-07-27 | 2021-06-30 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 0.08 | 6 | ||
2021-04-27 | 2021-03-31 | 1.01 | 1.06 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2021-02-18 | 2020-12-31 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2020-11-02 | 2020-09-30 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2020-07-30 | 2020-06-30 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.07 | 8 | ||
2020-05-06 | 2020-03-31 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2020-02-13 | 2019-12-31 | 1.15 | 1.19 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2019-10-23 | 2019-09-30 | 1.14 | 1.19 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2019-07-25 | 2019-06-30 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 0.03 | 2 | ||
2019-04-25 | 2019-03-31 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2019-02-14 | 2018-12-31 | 1.06 | 1.13 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2018-10-25 | 2018-09-30 | 1.11 | 1.15 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2018-07-25 | 2018-06-30 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2018-04-20 | 2018-03-31 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.08 | 9 | ||
2018-02-15 | 2017-12-31 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2017-07-26 | 2017-06-30 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2017-04-26 | 2017-03-31 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2017-02-16 | 2016-12-31 | 0.77 | 0.76 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2016-10-26 | 2016-09-30 | 0.8 | 0.84 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2016-07-27 | 2016-06-30 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2016-04-28 | 2016-03-31 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2016-02-18 | 2015-12-31 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2015-10-27 | 2015-09-30 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2015-07-23 | 2015-06-30 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 6 | ||
2015-04-29 | 2015-03-31 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2015-02-17 | 2014-12-31 | 0.6 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 11 | ||
2014-10-29 | 2014-09-30 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2014-07-29 | 2014-06-30 | 0.59 | 0.6 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2014-04-24 | 2014-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.05 | 11 | ||
2014-02-18 | 2013-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.56 | -0.05 | 8 | ||
2013-10-29 | 2013-09-30 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2013-07-30 | 2013-06-30 | 0.55 | 0.54 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-04-24 | 2013-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.4 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2013-02-14 | 2012-12-31 | 0.6 | 0.57 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
2012-10-31 | 2012-09-30 | 0.6 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2012-07-26 | 2012-06-30 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2012-04-26 | 2012-03-31 | 0.4 | 0.38 | -0.02 | 5 | ||
2012-02-16 | 2011-12-31 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-10-27 | 2011-09-30 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2011-07-28 | 2011-06-30 | 0.55 | 0.5 | -0.05 | 9 | ||
2011-04-28 | 2011-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.39 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2011-02-17 | 2010-12-31 | 0.54 | 0.6 | 0.06 | 11 | ||
2010-10-28 | 2010-09-30 | 0.58 | 0.55 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
2010-07-29 | 2010-06-30 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-04-29 | 2010-03-31 | 0.43 | 0.41 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2010-02-16 | 2009-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2009-10-29 | 2009-09-30 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2009-07-30 | 2009-06-30 | 0.54 | 0.52 | -0.02 | 3 | ||
2009-04-29 | 2009-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2009-02-12 | 2008-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-10-30 | 2008-09-30 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2008-07-29 | 2008-06-30 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 6 | ||
2008-04-29 | 2008-03-31 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-02-13 | 2007-12-31 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2007-10-26 | 2007-09-30 | 0.59 | 0.54 | -0.05 | 8 | ||
2007-07-31 | 2007-06-30 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2007-04-27 | 2007-03-31 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.07 | 19 | ||
2007-02-08 | 2006-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2006-10-25 | 2006-09-30 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.07 | 14 | ||
2006-07-28 | 2006-06-30 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2006-04-27 | 2006-03-31 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.05 | 16 | ||
2006-02-14 | 2005-12-31 | 0.4 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 15 | ||
2005-10-27 | 2005-09-30 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2005-07-28 | 2005-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.38 | -0.02 | 5 | ||
2005-04-28 | 2005-03-31 | 0.28 | 0.26 | -0.02 | 7 | ||
2005-02-10 | 2004-12-31 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2004-10-28 | 2004-09-30 | 0.41 | 0.4 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2004-07-29 | 2004-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2004-04-29 | 2004-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.25 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-02-12 | 2003-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 18 | ||
2003-10-30 | 2003-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.35 | -0.02 | 5 | ||
2003-08-05 | 2003-06-30 | 0.34 | 0.32 | -0.02 | 5 | ||
2003-04-29 | 2003-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.2 | -0.03 | 13 | ||
2003-02-18 | 2002-12-31 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.05 | 14 | ||
2002-10-31 | 2002-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-08-01 | 2002-06-30 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-05-07 | 2002-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.25 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2002-02-26 | 2001-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.25 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2001-11-07 | 2001-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.36 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2001-08-08 | 2001-06-30 | 0.34 | 0.33 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2001-05-09 | 2001-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.24 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2001-03-08 | 2000-12-31 | 0.31 | 0.29 | -0.02 | 6 | ||
2000-11-06 | 2000-09-30 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-08-08 | 2000-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2000-05-10 | 2000-03-31 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2000-03-27 | 1999-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.32 | -0.03 | 8 | ||
1999-11-09 | 1999-09-30 | 0.46 | 0.44 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
1999-08-03 | 1999-06-30 | 0.61 | 0.58 | -0.03 | 4 | ||
1999-05-06 | 1999-03-31 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
1999-02-25 | 1998-12-31 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-11-13 | 1998-09-30 | 0.51 | 0.49 | -0.02 | 3 | ||
1998-07-21 | 1998-06-30 | 0.54 | 0.53 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-04-29 | 1998-03-31 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 15 | ||
1998-02-25 | 1997-12-31 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-11-11 | 1997-09-30 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
1997-08-07 | 1997-06-30 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
1997-05-12 | 1997-03-31 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-03-07 | 1996-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-11-12 | 1996-09-30 | 0.33 | 0.32 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
1996-08-13 | 1996-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.29 | -0.02 | 6 | ||
1996-05-14 | 1996-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 34 |
Waste Management Corporate Directors
Victoria Holt | Independent Director | Profile | |
Sean Menke | Independent Director | Profile | |
Andres Gluski | Independent Director | Profile | |
Maryrose Sylvester | Independent Director | Profile |
Already Invested in Waste Management?
The danger of trading Waste Management is mainly related to its market volatility and Company specific events. As an investor, you must understand the concept of risk-adjusted return before you start trading. The most common way to measure the risk of Waste Management is by using the Sharpe ratio. The ratio expresses how much excess return you acquire for the extra volatility you endure for holding a more risker asset than Waste Management. The Sharpe ratio is calculated by using standard deviation and excess return to determine reward per unit of risk. To understand how volatile Waste Management is, you must compare it to a benchmark. Traditionally, the risk-free rate of return is the rate of return on the shortest-dated U.S. Treasury, such as a 3-year bond.
Check out Your Current Watchlist to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Waste Management. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in population. To learn how to invest in Waste Stock, please use our How to Invest in Waste Management guide.You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.
Is Environmental & Facilities Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Waste Management. If investors know Waste will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Waste Management listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.153 | Dividend Share 2.95 | Earnings Share 6.55 | Revenue Per Share 53.245 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.079 |
The market value of Waste Management is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Waste that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Waste Management's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Waste Management's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Waste Management's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Waste Management's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Waste Management's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Waste Management is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Waste Management's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.