Robert Michaleski - Vermilion Energy Independent Director
| VET Stock | CAD 14.37 0.07 0.49% |
Director
Mr. Robert B. Michaleski is Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Michaleski has 40 years of experience in various senior management and executive roles at Pembina Pipeline Corporation where he oversaw Pembinas transformation from an Albertabased oil pipeline company with an enterprise value of approximately 450 million into one of North Americas leading integrated energy transportation and midstream services company with an enterprise value of approximately 12.5 billion. Mr. Michaleski was the Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2013 and President from 2000 to 2012. Previously, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1997 to 2000, Vice President of Finance from 1992 to 1997, Controller from 1980 to 1992, and Manager of Internal Audit from 1978 to 1980. He was a director of Pembina since 2000, a director of Essential Energy Services Ltd. since 2012, and a director of Coril Holdings Ltd. since 2003. His focus on corporate philanthropy and community engagement programs includes service to the community in increasingly senior voluntary leadership roles with the United Way of Calgary and Area, including CoChair of the General Oil and Gas Division of the United Way of Calgary and Area member of the Board of Directors and Chair of the Board of Directors since 2016.
| Age | 65 |
| Tenure | 8 years |
| Address | 520 3rd Avenue SW, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2P 0R3 |
| Phone | 403 269 4884 |
| Web | https://www.vermilionenergy.com |
Vermilion Energy Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0563) % which means that it has lost $0.0563 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.2471) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Vermilion Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Vermilion Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 30th of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to -0.04. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.04. At this time, Vermilion Energy's Debt To Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 30th of November 2024, Fixed Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 0.46, while Intangible Assets are likely to drop about 5.6 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Andrew MacDonald | Tourmaline Oil Corp | 59 | |
| David Collyer | ARC Resources | 63 | |
| Daryl Gilbert | Whitecap Resources | 67 | |
| John Elick | Tourmaline Oil Corp | 76 | |
| Kathleen ONeill | ARC Resources | 65 | |
| Lee Baker | Tourmaline Oil Corp | 63 | |
| Phillip Lamoreaux | Tourmaline Oil Corp | 75 | |
| Stephen Nikiforuk | Whitecap Resources | 50 | |
| Harvey Doerr | MEG Energy Corp | 59 | |
| John Dielwart | ARC Resources | 66 | |
| Lucy Miller | Tourmaline Oil Corp | 67 | |
| Nancy Smith | ARC Resources | 57 | |
| Robert Hodgins | MEG Energy Corp | 67 | |
| Glenn McNamara | Whitecap Resources | 66 | |
| Gregory Fletcher | Whitecap Resources | 70 | |
| William Klesse | MEG Energy Corp | 72 | |
| Jill Angevine | Tourmaline Oil Corp | 51 | |
| Frederick Dyment | ARC Resources | 69 | |
| Diana McQueen | MEG Energy Corp | 57 | |
| Grant Zawalsky | Whitecap Resources | 59 | |
| William Sembo | ARC Resources | 65 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.25 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0563 |
Vermilion Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Vermilion Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Vermilion Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Vermilion. The board's role is to monitor Vermilion Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Vermilion Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Vermilion Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Stephen Larke, Independent Director | ||
| CPA CMA, Vice Marketing | ||
| Yvonne MSc, Vice Sustainability | ||
| PEng PEng, Managing Unit | ||
| Jenson Tan, Vice President - Business Development | ||
| Kyle CFA, Vice Relations | ||
| Pantxika Etcheverry, Managing Unit | ||
| Robert Engbloom, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Robert Michaleski, Independent Director | ||
| Averyl Schraven, Vice Culture | ||
| Yvonne Jeffery, Vice Sustainability | ||
| William Roby, Independent Director | ||
| Bruce PEng, Managing Unit | ||
| Anthony Hatcher, Vice President - Canadian Business Unit | ||
| CMA CPA, VP Marketing | ||
| Catherine Williams, Independent Director | ||
| Gerard Schut, Vice President - European Operations | ||
| Loren Leiker, Independent Director | ||
| Terry Hergott, Vice President - Marketing | ||
| Lars Glemser, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President | ||
| Curtis Hicks, CFO, Executive Vice President | ||
| Kyle Preston, Vice President of Investor Relations | ||
| Sylvain Nothhelfer, Managing Unit | ||
| Michael Kaluza, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Carin Knickel, Independent Director | ||
| Anthony PEng, CEO President | ||
| Tamar Epstein, General Secretary | ||
| Mona Jasinski, Executive Vice President - People and Culture | ||
| Scott PEng, MD Unit | ||
| Jenson PEng, Vice Development | ||
| Ryan Carty, Managing Unit | ||
| Lorenzo Donadeo, President CEO, Non-Independent Director | ||
| Lawrence Macdonald, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Sven Tummers, Managing Units | ||
| Timothy Marchant, Independent Director |
Vermilion Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Vermilion Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.25 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0563 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.46) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.23 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 3.05 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 155.1 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.10 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 46.31 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 5.39 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 13.76 X |
Pair Trading with Vermilion Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Vermilion Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Vermilion Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Vermilion Stock
| 0.69 | ENB-PFV | Enbridge Pref 5 | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | ENB-PFC | Enbridge Pref 11 | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | ENS | E Split Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.72 | ENS-PA | E Split Corp | PairCorr |
Moving against Vermilion Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Vermilion Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Vermilion Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Vermilion Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Vermilion Energy to buy it.
The correlation of Vermilion Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Vermilion Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Vermilion Energy moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Vermilion Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Vermilion Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. To learn how to invest in Vermilion Stock, please use our How to Invest in Vermilion Energy guide.You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.