Correlation Between Restaurant Brands and Starbucks

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Restaurant Brands and Starbucks at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Restaurant Brands and Starbucks into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Restaurant Brands International and Starbucks, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Restaurant Brands and Starbucks and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Restaurant Brands with a short position of Starbucks. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Restaurant Brands and Starbucks.

Diversification Opportunities for Restaurant Brands and Starbucks

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Restaurant and Starbucks is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Restaurant Brands Internationa and Starbucks in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Starbucks and Restaurant Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Restaurant Brands International are associated (or correlated) with Starbucks. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Starbucks has no effect on the direction of Restaurant Brands i.e., Restaurant Brands and Starbucks go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Restaurant Brands and Starbucks

Assuming the 90 days horizon Restaurant Brands is expected to generate 1.25 times less return on investment than Starbucks. In addition to that, Restaurant Brands is 1.01 times more volatile than Starbucks. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Starbucks is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  8,490  in Starbucks on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  30.00  from holding Starbucks or generate 0.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Restaurant Brands Internationa  vs.  Starbucks

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Restaurant Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Restaurant Brands International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Starbucks 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Starbucks has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental drivers, Starbucks is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Restaurant Brands and Starbucks Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands and Starbucks

The main advantage of trading using opposite Restaurant Brands and Starbucks positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, Starbucks can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Starbucks will offset losses from the drop in Starbucks' long position.
The idea behind Restaurant Brands International and Starbucks pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance