Correlation Between Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ashford Hospitality Trust and Regional Health Properties, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ashford Hospitality with a short position of Regional Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health.
Diversification Opportunities for Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health
0.06 | Correlation Coefficient |
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between Ashford and Regional is 0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ashford Hospitality Trust and Regional Health Properties in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Regional Health Prop and Ashford Hospitality is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ashford Hospitality Trust are associated (or correlated) with Regional Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Regional Health Prop has no effect on the direction of Ashford Hospitality i.e., Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ashford Hospitality Trust is expected to under-perform the Regional Health. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Ashford Hospitality Trust is 3.11 times less risky than Regional Health. The preferred stock trades about -0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Regional Health Properties is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 175.00 in Regional Health Properties on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.00) from holding Regional Health Properties or give up 1.71% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Ashford Hospitality Trust vs. Regional Health Properties
Performance |
Timeline |
Ashford Hospitality Trust |
Regional Health Prop |
Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ashford Hospitality and Regional Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ashford Hospitality position performs unexpectedly, Regional Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Regional Health will offset losses from the drop in Regional Health's long position.Ashford Hospitality vs. Braemar Hotels Resorts | Ashford Hospitality vs. Braemar Hotels Resorts | Ashford Hospitality vs. Aspen Digital | Ashford Hospitality vs. Sunstone Hotel Investors |
Regional Health vs. Ramsay Health Care | Regional Health vs. Jack Nathan Medical | Regional Health vs. Nova Leap Health | Regional Health vs. Fresenius SE Co |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. |