Correlation Between Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Consolidated Communications Holdings and EAT WELL INVESTMENT, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Consolidated Communications with a short position of EAT WELL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL.

Diversification Opportunities for Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Consolidated and EAT is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Consolidated Communications Ho and EAT WELL INVESTMENT in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on EAT WELL INVESTMENT and Consolidated Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Consolidated Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with EAT WELL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of EAT WELL INVESTMENT has no effect on the direction of Consolidated Communications i.e., Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL

Assuming the 90 days horizon Consolidated Communications Holdings is expected to generate 0.94 times more return on investment than EAT WELL. However, Consolidated Communications Holdings is 1.06 times less risky than EAT WELL. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. EAT WELL INVESTMENT is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  418.00  in Consolidated Communications Holdings on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  30.00  from holding Consolidated Communications Holdings or generate 7.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Consolidated Communications Ho  vs.  EAT WELL INVESTMENT

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Consolidated Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Consolidated Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Consolidated Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
EAT WELL INVESTMENT 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days EAT WELL INVESTMENT has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, EAT WELL is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL

The main advantage of trading using opposite Consolidated Communications and EAT WELL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Consolidated Communications position performs unexpectedly, EAT WELL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in EAT WELL will offset losses from the drop in EAT WELL's long position.
The idea behind Consolidated Communications Holdings and EAT WELL INVESTMENT pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA