Correlation Between Cogent Communications and EAT WELL

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cogent Communications and EAT WELL at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cogent Communications and EAT WELL into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cogent Communications Holdings and EAT WELL INVESTMENT, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cogent Communications and EAT WELL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cogent Communications with a short position of EAT WELL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cogent Communications and EAT WELL.

Diversification Opportunities for Cogent Communications and EAT WELL

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Cogent and EAT is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cogent Communications Holdings and EAT WELL INVESTMENT in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on EAT WELL INVESTMENT and Cogent Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cogent Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with EAT WELL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of EAT WELL INVESTMENT has no effect on the direction of Cogent Communications i.e., Cogent Communications and EAT WELL go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cogent Communications and EAT WELL

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cogent Communications Holdings is expected to generate 0.72 times more return on investment than EAT WELL. However, Cogent Communications Holdings is 1.4 times less risky than EAT WELL. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. EAT WELL INVESTMENT is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,646  in Cogent Communications Holdings on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,504  from holding Cogent Communications Holdings or generate 26.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cogent Communications Holdings  vs.  EAT WELL INVESTMENT

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cogent Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile primary indicators, Cogent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
EAT WELL INVESTMENT 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days EAT WELL INVESTMENT has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, EAT WELL is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Cogent Communications and EAT WELL Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cogent Communications and EAT WELL

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cogent Communications and EAT WELL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cogent Communications position performs unexpectedly, EAT WELL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in EAT WELL will offset losses from the drop in EAT WELL's long position.
The idea behind Cogent Communications Holdings and EAT WELL INVESTMENT pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences